|
|
Version 1.2
How many anarchists participated in the "Battle for Seattle"?
If you read most mainstream news accounts, you'd be led to believe that there
were 50 anarchists in Seattle who came just to smash windows.
In fact, conservative estimates put the actual number of anarchists
in Seattle during the week at around 4000. The actual number
is hard to determine, since no survey was taken of Seattle
participants. You also can't simply count the folks wearing
black as being "the anarchists." Most of the anarchists were
from the West Coast of North America, but there were also
plenty from all over North America. A few came from the U.K.
What kind of activities were they involved in?
Yes, anarchists were involved in the property destruction, but that was just
a small part of the anarchist involvement in N30 activities.
The funny thing is, those same anarchists who have been scolded
by other Leftists for breaking windows, were among the thousands
of people who nonviolently blockaded the WTO conference that
morning. This is evident on several videos which show black
bloc anarchists helping to block access to a hotel.
The corporate media has always done a poor job of showing
the hard work that activists engage in. They focus on showing
the spectacular, but can't show extended footage from a meeting.
Anarchists were engaged in a lot of the behind-the-scenes
organizing and shit work. The activities of thousands of anarchists
involved in N30 organizing helped make the overall events
such a success.
Anarchists were involved in the following activities:
Media and Comunications: Anarchists in Seattle
set up an "anarchist hotline" months before the event. Other
anarchists were involved with the Independent Media Center
and there were dozens who acted as amateur journalists. The
IMC has been said to have its origins in CounterMedia, which
was an anarchistic news organization that was set up for the
1996 Democratic Convention in Chicago. Anarchist videographers
filmed the Seattle riots and put together a short film within
24 hours of the N30 day of actions.
Anarchists set up websites before N30 and the anti-WTO week--these websites helped people prepare for the actions, communicate, and educate themselves. Several websites provided continuous coverage of the actions and archived the media coverage. Some anarchists wrote columns for newspapers, especially Seattle's Geov Parrish, who covered N30 for the Seattle Weekly and Eat The State.
Nonviolent Training and Event Planning: Anarchists helped
with nonviolence training and got some of it themselves. One of
the main coordinators of the nonviolence was DAN, which has a lot
of anarchist support.
Cultural: This was most evident in the many beautiful
puppets that were present throughout the week in Seattle. Some of
these were done by Art and Revolution Convergence, a puppet group
from the Bay Area. Many folks saw the wonderful anarchist marching
band.
Direct Actions: The most obvious example of this
were the building that were squatted in Seattle during the week.
One of these squats was featured on the U.S. network TV news. The
Seattle boss media also had extensive coverage of the squats and
talked about the issues raised by the direct action.
Labor March: Anarchists participated in the labor
march, especially the IWW contingent. The IWW helped divert some
of the ran and file from the business unions into the occupied streets,
where they helped shut down the area around the convention center.
Logistics: This included work such as medics during
the events and jail support.
Downtown Occupation: A lot of anarchists helped
shut down the WTO meeting. They helped blockade hotels, streets,
and intersections. Many were gassed and some were handcuffed while
sitting in the street. More anarchists were involved in the street
sit-ins than in the property destruction, a fine point that the
boss (and Left) media ignores.
Property Destruction: Needless to say.
N30 around the world: There were dozens of N30
events around the world, many of which were organized by anarchists,
including Memphis, Tennesse and Lousiville, Kentucky.
Weren't the anarchists doing the work of police provocateurs by damaging property?
Why did the Eugene anarchists engage in property destruction?
All kinds of motives have been ascribed to the anarchists involved in the property
destruction, but few journalists or activists have taken the time
to talk to them, or read their manifestos and communiques. Their
most famous communique is the N30 Black
Bloc Communique, which was issued by the ACME Collective the
weekend after the Seattle actions. This communique even spells out
that it conveys the opinions of only SOME individuals and groups
within the black bloc. It spells out the corporate properties that
were targeted and explains who was in the black block, saying that
" we hail from all over the United States, including Seattle"
Aren't the Eugene anarchists just a bunch of teenage hooligans?
As a matter of fact, many of the Eugene anarchists who went to Seattle are
in their 20s, with several being over 30.
What is a black bloc? Is this some kind of phalanx of violent anarchists?
There seems to be some mystification and confusion about what an Anarchist
Black Bloc represents. Black bloc are not an ongoing organization
of anarchists. They are not a terrorist cell. Black blocs are simply
a temporary grouping of anarchists at an event or action.
In April of 1999, several hundred anarchists formed a black bloc
at Millions 4 Mumia in Philadelphia. They are manifestations of
anarchist power and pride. In other words, black blocs are equivalent
to a gay/queer pride march.
Why didn't the window-smashing anarchists consult with the other protesters?
The members of the Black Bloc who were involved in window smashing, etc. were
very open and vocal about their plans at a large number of the planning
meetings. As far as consulting the other protesters, that would
not be the least bit possible because of the vast numbers and loose
(but effective) organizational structure. The other problem with
running your plans by a large group is that once property was beginning
to be destroyed, there were groups of "pacifists" physically assaulting
window smashers while yelling "This is a non-violent protest."
Aren't the anarchists just jumping on the bandwagon?
Do all anarchists support the property destruction?
No, not all anarchists are supportive of this tactic, but any educated anarchist
would not consider smashing a window or any form of property damage
as violent. The reason many anarchists do not support it is a question
of its validity as a tactic. It can be argued (and has been far
and wide) that the smashing of windows takes away from the message
of an action, that it gives the police a reason to over-react (this
was not the case in Seattle, thousands of protesters had been tear
gassed and shot with rubber bullets well before the first window
was smashed on the 30th) and use extreme violence and have it defended
in the media.
Wasn't there looting at the Seattle actions?
Yes. In addition to the politically-oriented property destruction there was
some looting of stores. This looting was done by folks at the street
actions, including young people from Seattle. What's funny is that
the anti-WTO protests have been criticized for lacking the involvement
by people of color, yet the looting and property destruction was
conducted by a diverse portion of the crowd. It's pretty odd to
hear white middle class activists condemning young people for stealing
a few trinkets that the activists can easily afford. As one anarchist
has related:
"What is interesting but rarely discussed was there was one moment that
saw a large number of black and hispanic youths participating at N30. After
hearing of the Black Bloc actions, a number of these youths suddenly showed
up downtown to do some smashing (as well as looting) of their own. When
Jeffrey St. Claire started to leave town on Dec 3rd, a black youth rushed up
to him and excitedly asked if this WTO thing will come back next year.
Sure, the labor march and enviro's were mostly white folks. But the actions
against corporate property was the one truly diverse, inclusive, festive
action. Who tried to stop the youths? Medea Benjamin's peace Nazi's.
Cascadia Alive has footage of Medea Benjamin and her cohorts assaulting
black Seattle youth while her gang was defending Nike, Levi's and other
sweatshop outlets. The smug hypocrites were chanting "non-violent protest"
as their goons thumped on the youth (REAL violence against people). They
also tried to hold several of them and hand them over to the pigs. Now
those sorts of actions are REAL threats."
Is everyone who paints a circle-A on the side of a building an anarchist...?
Why do anarchists and other folks want to destroy property?
How much money did the property destruction cost the merchants? Were there over $10 million in lost sales?
|
|
BACKGROUND
The protests and direct action that took place in Seattle in late November
and early December of 1999 were inspiring, exciting,
and signaled a new optimism for the North American anti-capitalist
movement. The Seattle protests on November 30th were
also part of an international day of actions against
capitalism, something which is neglected by most media,
including the so-called "alternative" media. As the
events in Seattle recede into history, finger-pointing
and divisiveness continue among the groups that participated
in the N30 events. It surprises us that the mainstream
"boss" media was fairer to anarchists who participated
in Seattle, than the pundits and writers for the Left
and alternative press. One of the main focuses of the
finger-pointing has been the actions of the Black Bloc
and friends, specifically the trashing of store windows
and spray-painting of building facades. A lot of disinformation
and misinformation surrounds those actions, as well
as the involvement of anarchists throughout the week
in Seattle. This FAQ aims to clarify what the anarchists
actually did in Seattle and N30 around the world. It
will also explain their goals and desires.
|
|